Original Source HTML
The 2026 Motorola Razr+ costs $1,099, $100 more than its predecessor. That’s an awfully bold move from Motorola, considering the foldable is powered by the same chip as the 2024 and 2025 models and also reuses the design and screens from previous generations. While the Razr+ delivers a much-needed boost in battery life, that’s less of a breakthrough and more of a catch-up with rivals. Combined with the middling performance and software issues I ran into during testing, it’s hard to recommend the Razr+. If you're after a flip-style phone, you're better off with the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 ($1,099.99), which delivers a similar experience with great cameras, advanced Galaxy AI, and a longer support commitment, all of which make it our Editors' Choice.
Design: Comfortable With Curves
Take a look at the Razr+’s Pantone Mountain View chassis. Do you dig the deep, earthy forest-green aesthetic? If you do, great. If not, tough luck. This is the only colorway available for the Razr+.
(Credit: Kimberly Gedeon)Taking up the lower half of the phone, Motorola describes this finish as a “woven jacquard-inspired” tactile texture. It doesn’t quite deliver the same sensory treat as the Alcantara and wood finishes on the pricier Razr Ultra ($1,499), but I appreciate that it keeps grease and fingerprints at bay.
If you want more colorways to choose from, consider the entry-level Razr ($799), which comes in Pantone Bright White, Pantone Hematite, Pantone Sporting Green, and Pantone Violet Ice. The Razr+’s rival, the Galaxy Z Flip 7, also offers more finishes, including Blue Shadow, Coralred, Jetblack, and the online-exclusive Mint.
Dimensions and Weight
Wrapping my fingers around the Razr+, whether unfurled or wide open, is an absolute dream, thanks to rounded edges that nestle nicely into my palm without digging in. If you’re wondering how the Razr+ stacks up against its sibling devices and outside competitors, the numbers tell an interesting story.
(Credit: Kimberly Gedeon)The Razr+, measuring 6.75 by 2.91 by 0.28 inches (HWD) when opened, shares similar dimensions to the regular Razr (6.74 by 2.91 by 0.29 inches) and the Razr Ultra (6.75 by 2.91 by 0.28 inches) when unfolded.
However, when folded, the Razr+ is the thinnest among the triplets (3.47 by 2.91 by 0.60 inches). The entry-level Razr (3.47 by 2.91 by 0.63 inches) is the thickest, while the Razr Ultra (3.47 by 2.91 by 0.62 inches) lands between the two. In terms of weight, the 6.67-ounce Razr+ sits squarely in the middle between the heavier 7.02-ounce Razr Ultra and the lighter 6.63-ounce entry-level Razr.
Meanwhile, the Galaxy Z Flip 7 measures 6.56 by 2.96 by 0.26 inches when opened and 3.37 by 2.96 by 0.54 inches when closed. This Razr+ is taller, narrower, and thicker than the Z Flip 7 and also slightly heavier.
If you prefer a lightweight, compact foldable, the Z Flip 7 is the winner here.
Durability
You’ll find a titanium-strengthened hinge, which Motorola claims can withstand at least 200,000 folds, across the entire Razr lineup. The Razr+ and Razr share a Corning Gorilla Glass Victus cover display.
(Credit: Kimberly Gedeon)The Galaxy Z Flip 7 features Gorilla Glass Victus 2, which is designed to be tougher than first-gen Victus against rough surfaces like concrete and asphalt.
If you want to reach foldable screen nirvana, get the Razr Ultra. Thanks to its Gorilla Glass Ceramic 3 panel, the Razr Ultra doesn’t just outclass its siblings and Z Flip 7—it offers the best screen protection of any foldable, period. Compared with Victus and Victus 2, Ceramic 3 delivers top-notch drop resistance.
Keep in mind, though, that the Razr+ isn’t dust-tight, so keep it away from sand and other particles smaller than 1mm. Its IP48 rating means it can withstand submersion in fresh water up to about five feet deep for 30 minutes. The Galaxy Z Flip 7 shares the same IP rating as the Razr family.
Buttons and Ports
On the right, you’ll find volume up and down buttons, as well as a power key that doubles as a fingerprint reader. Setting up biometrics was a breeze. After a quick touch-and-lift process, my fingerprint was registered in seconds. If you prefer hands-free authentication, Motorola also offers face unlock. It’s just as quick and convenient, though the fingerprint reader remains the more secure option.
(Credit: Kimberly Gedeon)On the left side is the SIM card slot. Unlike the Razr Ultra and Edge, the Razr+ doesn’t have an AI key that launches Moto AI. The bottom edge houses a USB-C port and Dolby Atmos speakers.
Display: A Barely There Crease
The Razr+ is a dual-display dazzler that splashes screens across a striking 4.0-inch cover display and a spacious 6.9-inch internal panel when unfolded. While you can run full apps on the external screen, I don’t see why you’d want to when you have nearly seven inches of internal-display goodness.
(Credit: Kimberly Gedeon)During testing, I preferred using the external display for quick checks, ditching the extra step of unfolding the Razr+. This includes glancing at notifications, emails, texts—and even the NBA Finals score when I’m trying to be discreet (Go Knicks!). While queuing at the grocery store, I loved playing mini games on the external display to pass the time. I also appreciate the cover screen’s Daily Drop feature, which delivers a personalized carousel of news headlines, weather, calendar events, Google Photos memories, and more.
Of course, when it comes to streaming my favorite shows or reading long-form PCMag articles, the sprawling external display is the better option.
Outer Display
The Razr+’s external display boasts an Extreme AMOLED, 1,272-by-1,080-pixel, 2,400-nit panel with a refresh rate of 165Hz. Save for the Razr Ultra’s 3,000-nit cover display, the Razr+ shares the same screen specs as its pricier sibling.
(Credit: Kimberly Gedeon)The entry-level Razr, on the other hand, features a smaller 3.6-inch cover display with a 90Hz refresh rate, 1,700 nits of peak brightness, and a 1,066-by-1,056-pixel resolution.
During testing, the Razr Ultra’s external display is most visible while direct sunlight pours over you. Although the Razr and Razr+ feature dimmer external displays, I still found them bright enough to remain visible without squinting or seeking shade.
The Galaxy Z Flip 7 has a slightly larger 4.1-inch, Super AMOLED cover display, with a slightly lower resolution of 1,048 by 948 pixels and a variable refresh rate that fluctuates between 60Hz and 120Hz. With a peak brightness of 2,600 nits, it’s a touch more brilliant than the Razr+. If you placed the Razr+ and Z Flip 7 side-by-side, you likely won’t notice a major difference in brightness—but you’d probably spot that the Motorola is sharper and more crisp.
Inner Display
The 6.9-inch, Extreme AMOLED display on the Razr+ has the same screen size as the standard Razr, but doesn’t match the larger panel on the Razr Ultra.
(Credit: Kimberly Gedeon)It boasts a 2,640-by-1,080-pixel panel, 3,000 nits of peak brightness, and a 165Hz refresh rate. The Razr Ultra shares the same refresh rate but takes it up a notch with a 2,992-by-1,224-pixel screen and 5,000 nits of peak brightness. The simpler Razr shares the same pixel count and brightness as the Razr+, but has a top refresh rate of 120Hz.
Don’t be seduced by the "165Hz" vanity metric. While the Razr Ultra and Razr+ support it, the higher rate only kicks in during gaming sessions. If you're not much of a gamer, the refresh rate boost is of little value to you.
The crease is foldables’ least attractive trait, but the Razr lineup shows we’re nearing an era of perfectly flat displays. I have to catch the Razr+ at just the right angle for the crease to reveal itself. It hasn’t vanished entirely, but its presence is subtle. Looks like foldable haters will have to find a new excuse.
Performance: Trapped in the Middle
I can't hide my disappointment here. For three years straight, the Razr+ has used the same Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chip, paired with 12GB of RAM and 256GB of storage. Don't forget, Motorola increased the price by $100 this year.
(Credit: Kimberly Gedeon)I ran some benchmarks to see how the Razr+ compares with the Z Flip 7 and its Exynos 2500 chip.
Geekbench 6
Geekbench 6 tests phones' CPU muscle, and the Razr+ hit single-core and multi-core scores of 1,899 and 4,801, respectively. Last year’s Razr+ notched scores of 1,881 and 4,658, nearly matching the 2024 model's scores of 1,892 and 4,648. The performance uptick that Motorola squeezed from the 2026 Razr+ is minor at best, with results showing no significant year-over-year gains.
If you’re curious how the 2026 Razr+ stacks up against the Razr Ultra (Snapdragon 8 Elite) and the standard Razr (MediaTek Dimensity 7450X), the scores are 3,027 and 9,139 for the former and 1,042 and 3,312 for the latter.
The Galaxy Flip 7 blew the Razr and Razr+ out of the water with 2,267 and 7,594.
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
The 3DMark Wild Life Extreme app tests the GPU, and the Razr+ notched a score of 3,107 with an average frame rate of 18.61 frames per second (fps). On the same test, the entry-level Razr hit 1,067 at 6.40fps. The Razr Ultra sports so much graphics muscle that 3DMark refuses to run the test because it’s “too powerful.”
My experience running Genshin Impact on the Razr+ perfectly encapsulates its position in the Motorola family: stuck in the middle. Pushing the game as far as the device would allow (i.e., custom graphics at 60fps), I didn’t see the razor-sharp visuals you’d get from more powerful flagships, but the expansive world remained colorful and vibrant. Plus, the Razr+ didn't choke when I flung myself into fast-paced combat.
Battery Life: A Massive Upgrade
The Razr+ features a larger 4,500mAh battery than its predecessor, lasting 17 hours and 4 minutes on the PCMag test, which includes streaming a 1080p video over Wi-Fi with the screen at maximum brightness. This is a massive jump from the 2025 model's 4,000mAh battery, which lasted an embarrassing 12 hours and 57 minutes.
(Credit: Kimberly Gedeon)The standard Razr squeezes more life out of its 4,800mAh battery than the Razr+, lasting 19 hours and 10 minutes. The Razr Ultra delivers a whopping 21 hours and 6 minutes of battery life.
The Razr+ supports up to 45W wired charging, 15W wireless charging, and reverse charging. When I charged the foldable, it reached 31% in 15 minutes, 67% in 30 minutes, and 100% in 1 hour and 11 minutes.
Connections: Solid Radios
No matter which Razr you choose, you’ll get support for sub-6GHz 5G, including C-band, but you won’t get mmWave. If mmWave is a must for you, pick up the Galaxy Z Flip 7. The Razr+ also supports NFC, Bluetooth 5.4, and Wi-Fi 7.
(Credit: Kimberly Gedeon)To see how the Razr+’s radios handle the real world, I took them for a spin on the Verizon network across Long Island. The phone reached a peak download speed of 385Mbps and a maximum upload speed of 21.7Mbps. For context, the iPhone 17 Pro Max hit 523Mbps down and 17.2Mbps up.
When connected to my Wi-Fi 6E home router, the Razr+ reached peak download and upload speeds of 310Mbps and 293Mbps, respectively. The 17 Pro Max matched the Razr+’s download speed but beat the Motorola foldable in upload speed (324Mbps).
On the edge of my home's Wi-Fi network, the Razr+ reached maximum speeds of 46Mbps down and 21.7Mbps up, where the iPhone 17 Pro Max hit 80.3Mbps down and 15.2Mbps up.
Audio: Flat Mics, But Punchy Speakers
I’ve tested the entire Razr lineup, and the story is the same across the board: The mics are unremarkable. In a test recording, I was intelligible, but my voice sounded flatter and murkier than I’d like. When it came to background noise, the trio of microphones filtered ambient sounds, but louder distractions, like a fan at the corner of the room, still leaked through.
(Credit: Kimberly Gedeon)The earpiece reached 74.2dB on our sound meter test. I’ve seen better results with far cheaper phones (Samsung Galaxy A57), but it still delivers solid call clarity. Switching to speakerphone, the volume reached 85dB, which is sufficiently loud if you need calls to cut through a noisy environment. Our threshold is 70dB, and the Razr+ cleared that bar with some room to spare.
It’s no surprise that the Razr+’s Dolby Atmos-tuned stereo speakers are easy on the ears. Our test track, The Knife's “Silent Shout,” sounded clean, clear, and crisp without any noticeable distortion at max volume. I still recommend pairing the foldable with the Bluetooth headphones of your choice.
Cameras: Ultrawide Is Back, But Telephoto Is Out
The previous Razr+ didn't have an ultrawide camera, so you couldn't capture landscape shots or wide group pictures to get more scenery into the frame. Motorola changed that on the 2026 model, dropping the telephoto for a 50MP ultrawide camera at f/2.0, so there's no more optical zoom to pull distant subjects closer. The Razr+ also has a 50MP, f/1.8 main camera as well as a 32MP, f/2.4 selfie shooter.
(Credit: Kimberly Gedeon)All three cameras use quad-pixel binning by default, so if you want to shoot at the cameras' full resolutions, you'll need to switch to high mode in settings. I took the Razr+'s shooters for a spin during a trip to Long Beach, California, so let's dive into their performance.
Main Camera
I'm a huge taco fanatic, and while this particular one I ate wasn't great, I thought the wide camera did a decent job of capturing my messy lunch.
I shot the dish in both standard and high-resolution modes. With the former, the orange tint of the taco shells looks deeper and more appetizing. High-res mode, on the other hand, excels at creating separation between the subject and the background; the blurred backdrop makes the taco shells appear much sharper and more striking by comparison.
You can see the same story with my shots of the Lincoln Park Giant Penny sculpture. Standard mode produces a slightly richer, warmer capture than high mode; it also appears more three-dimensional.
In this stingray photo, the sand and gravel appear more distinct and defined in the high-resolution shot—even the blue spots look a tinge punchier.
The standard mode shot holds up well; the differences become apparent when you zoom in and scrutinize the details.
Ultrawide Camera
Bringing back the ultrawide camera was the right call. Without a telephoto lens, you can still rely on digital zoom, but your zoomed-in shots will suffer in clarity. However, being left without an ultra-wide sensor is a huge limitation; there are no software tricks to artificially expand your field of view.
At night, I shot a nearby dock while queuing to enter Long Beach's Aquarium of the Pacific. I don't love this photo of the sky; there's too much noise. The palm trees look grainy, too. On the plus side, the exposure is balanced, the colors are natural, and it offers a sweeping perspective of the marina.
This early afternoon shot of the Cinemark theater has decent dynamic range; the white building preserves its detail, and the cloud isn't blown out.
Colors pop without that cartoonish, ultra-vivid look that marks some Android phones. Plus, there's no wild warping or inward bending, which occurs on some ultrawide sensors.
Zoom
As mentioned, there isn't a dedicated telephoto lens on the Razr+—and it shows.
I took a picture of my short rib dish at a restaurant. The 2x shot struggled to capture textures, from the distinct vertical lines on my potato to the delicate fibers on the beef. On the plus side, the image processing did well in spotting the cilantro flakes and string beans, creating sharp contrast lines between the green accents and the rest of the meal.
At 3x, the Razr+'s image processing tried to save the shot by overexposing the dish, but unfortunately, my dinner just looks like an inedible oil painting with a glossy sheen.
Selfie Camera
One drawback of using a traditional, nonfoldable phone is that it's awkward to take a selfie with the main camera. It's possible, but you don't have a viewfinder to see if you're in frame.
The Razr+ fixes that issue, allowing you to use its main camera for selfies while displaying a viewfinder on the outer screen. I took selfies with both the 32MP front-facing camera and the 50MP main camera.
The higher-quality main sensor produced more definition in my curls. Plus, my eyelashes, skin texture, and eyeliner look far crisper and sharper. My colorful jersey is more vibrant and accurate. The selfie taken with the 32MP camera had a more washed-out, hazy aesthetic, making the photo look flat in color and contrast.
Video
You can capture video with the Razr+ at up to 4K resolution at 60fps, or drop down to 1080p at 60fps or 30fps. It produces decent color and detail in bright conditions, but noise becomes noticeable in low light.
Software: Moto AI Troubles
The Razr+ ships with Android 16, and comes with three years of Android OS upgrades and five years of bi-monthly security updates. This is a step up from last year's three years of OS upgrades and four years of security support, but it looks stingy next to Galaxy Z Flip 7's seven-year commitment.
(Credit: Kimberly Gedeon)Moto AI is supposed to be the marquee software feature on the Razr+. Unfortunately, it refused to run on my review unit. While the software worked flawlessly on the standard Razr, Razr Ultra, and Edge, the Razr+ simply wouldn't run it. I tried every troubleshooting trick in the book, including a full factory reset, but nothing worked.
It’s possible I received a lemon, so I'm waiting on a replacement to see if this is an isolated incident or a broader bug. We'll update this review when we retest the new unit.
Moto AI troubles aside, the Razr+ still has some notable software features, including fun gestures to launch apps and tools. For example, I turned the flashlight on with two chopping motions and enabled Do Not Disturb by simply flipping the phone over.
As someone who loves to multitask, I also enjoy using the Razr+'s large screen to run two apps at once. I can put YouTube in the top half of the screen while taking notes on the bottom half. Between the productivity-friendly foldable form factor and Motorola’s thoughtful gestures, there’s still plenty to like here despite the non-working AI features.
Optimized Body HTML
The 2026 Motorola Razr+ costs $1,099 (about AED 4,050 / SAR 4,100), $100 more than its predecessor. That’s an awfully bold move from Motorola, considering the foldable is powered by the same chip as the 2024 and 2025 models and also reuses the design and screens from previous generations. While the Razr+ delivers a much-needed boost in battery life, that’s less of a breakthrough and more of a catch-up with rivals. Combined with the middling performance and software issues I ran into during testing, it’s hard to recommend the Razr+. If you're after a flip-style phone, you're better off with the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 ($1,099.99), which delivers a similar experience with great cameras, advanced Galaxy AI, and a longer support commitment, all of which make it our Editors' Choice.
Design: Comfortable With Curves
Take a look at the Razr+’s Pantone Mountain View chassis. Do you dig the deep, earthy forest-green aesthetic? If you do, great. If not, tough luck. This is the only colorway available for the Razr+.
(Credit: Kimberly Gedeon)Taking up the lower half of the phone, Motorola describes this finish as a “woven jacquard-inspired” tactile texture. It doesn’t quite deliver the same sensory treat as the Alcantara and wood finishes on the pricier Razr Ultra ($1,499 (about AED 5,500 / SAR 5,600)), but I appreciate that it keeps grease and fingerprints at bay.
If you want more colorways to choose from, consider the entry-level Razr ($799), which comes in Pantone Bright White, Pantone Hematite, Pantone Sporting Green, and Pantone Violet Ice. The Razr+’s rival, the Galaxy Z Flip 7, also offers more finishes, including Blue Shadow, Coralred, Jetblack, and the online-exclusive Mint.
Dimensions and Weight
Wrapping my fingers around the Razr+, whether unfurled or wide open, is an absolute dream, thanks to rounded edges that nestle nicely into my palm without digging in. If you’re wondering how the Razr+ stacks up against its sibling devices and outside competitors, the numbers tell an interesting story.
(Credit: Kimberly Gedeon)The Razr+, measuring 6.75 by 2.91 by 0.28 inches (HWD) when opened, shares similar dimensions to the regular Razr (6.74 by 2.91 by 0.29 inches) and the Razr Ultra (6.75 by 2.91 by 0.28 inches) when unfolded.
However, when folded, the Razr+ is the thinnest among the triplets (3.47 by 2.91 by 0.60 inches). The entry-level Razr (3.47 by 2.91 by 0.63 inches) is the thickest, while the Razr Ultra (3.47 by 2.91 by 0.62 inches) lands between the two. In terms of weight, the 6.67-ounce Razr+ sits squarely in the middle between the heavier 7.02-ounce Razr Ultra and the lighter 6.63-ounce entry-level Razr.
Meanwhile, the Galaxy Z Flip 7 measures 6.56 by 2.96 by 0.26 inches when opened and 3.37 by 2.96 by 0.54 inches when closed. This Razr+ is taller, narrower, and thicker than the Z Flip 7 and also slightly heavier.
If you prefer a lightweight, compact foldable, the Z Flip 7 is the winner here.
Durability
You’ll find a titanium-strengthened hinge, which Motorola claims can withstand at least 200,000 folds, across the entire Razr lineup. The Razr+ and Razr share a Corning Gorilla Glass Victus cover display.
(Credit: Kimberly Gedeon)The Galaxy Z Flip 7 features Gorilla Glass Victus 2, which is designed to be tougher than first-gen Victus against rough surfaces like concrete and asphalt.
If you want to reach foldable screen nirvana, get the Razr Ultra. Thanks to its Gorilla Glass Ceramic 3 panel, the Razr Ultra doesn’t just outclass its siblings and Z Flip 7—it offers the best screen protection of any foldable, period. Compared with Victus and Victus 2, Ceramic 3 delivers top-notch drop resistance.
Keep in mind, though, that the Razr+ isn’t dust-tight, so keep it away from sand and other particles smaller than 1mm. Its IP48 rating means it can withstand submersion in fresh water up to about five feet deep for 30 minutes. The Galaxy Z Flip 7 shares the same IP rating as the Razr family.
Buttons and Ports
On the right, you’ll find volume up and down buttons, as well as a power key that doubles as a fingerprint reader. Setting up biometrics was a breeze. After a quick touch-and-lift process, my fingerprint was registered in seconds. If you prefer hands-free authentication, Motorola also offers face unlock. It’s just as quick and convenient, though the fingerprint reader remains the more secure option.
(Credit: Kimberly Gedeon)On the left side is the SIM card slot. Unlike the Razr Ultra and Edge, the Razr+ doesn’t have an AI key that launches Moto AI. The bottom edge houses a USB-C port and Dolby Atmos speakers.
Display: A Barely There Crease
The Razr+ is a dual-display dazzler that splashes screens across a striking 4.0-inch cover display and a spacious 6.9-inch internal panel when unfolded. While you can run full apps on the external screen, I don’t see why you’d want to when you have nearly seven inches of internal-display goodness.
(Credit: Kimberly Gedeon)During testing, I preferred using the external display for quick checks, ditching the extra step of unfolding the Razr+. This includes glancing at notifications, emails, texts—and even the NBA Finals score when I’m trying to be discreet (Go Knicks!). While queuing at the grocery store, I loved playing mini games on the external display to pass the time. I also appreciate the cover screen’s Daily Drop feature, which delivers a personalized carousel of news headlines, weather, calendar events, Google Photos memories, and more.
Of course, when it comes to streaming my favorite shows or reading long-form PCMag articles, the sprawling external display is the better option.
Outer Display
The Razr+’s external display boasts an Extreme AMOLED, 1,272-by-1,080-pixel, 2,400-nit panel with a refresh rate of 165Hz. Save for the Razr Ultra’s 3,000-nit cover display, the Razr+ shares the same screen specs as its pricier sibling.
(Credit: Kimberly Gedeon)The entry-level Razr, on the other hand, features a smaller 3.6-inch cover display with a 90Hz refresh rate, 1,700 nits of peak brightness, and a 1,066-by-1,056-pixel resolution.
During testing, the Razr Ultra’s external display is most visible while direct sunlight pours over you. Although the Razr and Razr+ feature dimmer external displays, I still found them bright enough to remain visible without squinting or seeking shade.
The Galaxy Z Flip 7 has a slightly larger 4.1-inch, Super AMOLED cover display, with a slightly lower resolution of 1,048 by 948 pixels and a variable refresh rate that fluctuates between 60Hz and 120Hz. With a peak brightness of 2,600 nits, it’s a touch more brilliant than the Razr+. If you placed the Razr+ and Z Flip 7 side-by-side, you likely won’t notice a major difference in brightness—but you’d probably spot that the Motorola is sharper and more crisp.
Inner Display
The 6.9-inch, Extreme AMOLED display on the Razr+ has the same screen size as the standard Razr, but doesn’t match the larger panel on the Razr Ultra.
(Credit: Kimberly Gedeon)It boasts a 2,640-by-1,080-pixel panel, 3,000 nits of peak brightness, and a 165Hz refresh rate. The Razr Ultra shares the same refresh rate but takes it up a notch with a 2,992-by-1,224-pixel screen and 5,000 nits of peak brightness. The simpler Razr shares the same pixel count and brightness as the Razr+, but has a top refresh rate of 120Hz.
Don’t be seduced by the "165Hz" vanity metric. While the Razr Ultra and Razr+ support it, the higher rate only kicks in during gaming sessions. If you're not much of a gamer, the refresh rate boost is of little value to you.
The crease is foldables’ least attractive trait, but the Razr lineup shows we’re nearing an era of perfectly flat displays. I have to catch the Razr+ at just the right angle for the crease to reveal itself. It hasn’t vanished entirely, but its presence is subtle. Looks like foldable haters will have to find a new excuse.
Performance: Trapped in the Middle
I can't hide my disappointment here. For three years straight, the Razr+ has used the same Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chip, paired with 12GB of RAM and 256GB of storage. Don't forget, Motorola increased the price by $100 this year.
(Credit: Kimberly Gedeon)I ran some benchmarks to see how the Razr+ compares with the Z Flip 7 and its Exynos 2500 chip.
Geekbench 6
Geekbench 6 tests phones' CPU muscle, and the Razr+ hit single-core and multi-core scores of 1,899 and 4,801, respectively. Last year’s Razr+ notched scores of 1,881 and 4,658, nearly matching the 2024 model's scores of 1,892 and 4,648. The performance uptick that Motorola squeezed from the 2026 Razr+ is minor at best, with results showing no significant year-over-year gains.
If you’re curious how the 2026 Razr+ stacks up against the Razr Ultra (Snapdragon 8 Elite) and the standard Razr (MediaTek Dimensity 7450X), the scores are 3,027 and 9,139 for the former and 1,042 and 3,312 for the latter.
The Galaxy Flip 7 blew the Razr and Razr+ out of the water with 2,267 and 7,594.
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
The 3DMark Wild Life Extreme app tests the GPU, and the Razr+ notched a score of 3,107 with an average frame rate of 18.61 frames per second (fps). On the same test, the entry-level Razr hit 1,067 at 6.40fps. The Razr Ultra sports so much graphics muscle that 3DMark refuses to run the test because it’s “too powerful.”
My experience running Genshin Impact on the Razr+ perfectly encapsulates its position in the Motorola family: stuck in the middle. Pushing the game as far as the device would allow (i.e., custom graphics at 60fps), I didn’t see the razor-sharp visuals you’d get from more powerful flagships, but the expansive world remained colorful and vibrant. Plus, the Razr+ didn't choke when I flung myself into fast-paced combat.
Battery Life: A Massive Upgrade
The Razr+ features a larger 4,500mAh battery than its predecessor, lasting 17 hours and 4 minutes on the PCMag test, which includes streaming a 1080p video over Wi-Fi with the screen at maximum brightness. This is a massive jump from the 2025 model's 4,000mAh battery, which lasted an embarrassing 12 hours and 57 minutes.
(Credit: Kimberly Gedeon)The standard Razr squeezes more life out of its 4,800mAh battery than the Razr+, lasting 19 hours and 10 minutes. The Razr Ultra delivers a whopping 21 hours and 6 minutes of battery life.
The Razr+ supports up to 45W wired charging, 15W wireless charging, and reverse charging. When I charged the foldable, it reached 31% in 15 minutes, 67% in 30 minutes, and 100% in 1 hour and 11 minutes.
Connections: Solid Radios
No matter which Razr you choose, you’ll get support for sub-6GHz 5G, including C-band, but you won’t get mmWave. If mmWave is a must for you, pick up the Galaxy Z Flip 7. The Razr+ also supports NFC, Bluetooth 5.4, and Wi-Fi 7.
(Credit: Kimberly Gedeon)To see how the Razr+’s radios handle the real world, I took them for a spin on the Verizon network across Long Island. The phone reached a peak download speed of 385Mbps and a maximum upload speed of 21.7Mbps. For context, the iPhone 17 Pro Max hit 523Mbps down and 17.2Mbps up.
When connected to my Wi-Fi 6E home router, the Razr+ reached peak download and upload speeds of 310Mbps and 293Mbps, respectively. The 17 Pro Max matched the Razr+’s download speed but beat the Motorola foldable in upload speed (324Mbps).
On the edge of my home's Wi-Fi network, the Razr+ reached maximum speeds of 46Mbps down and 21.7Mbps up, where the iPhone 17 Pro Max hit 80.3Mbps down and 15.2Mbps up.
Audio: Flat Mics, But Punchy Speakers
I’ve tested the entire Razr lineup, and the story is the same across the board: The mics are unremarkable. In a test recording, I was intelligible, but my voice sounded flatter and murkier than I’d like. When it came to background noise, the trio of microphones filtered ambient sounds, but louder distractions, like a fan at the corner of the room, still leaked through.
(Credit: Kimberly Gedeon)The earpiece reached 74.2dB on our sound meter test. I’ve seen better results with far cheaper phones (Samsung Galaxy A57), but it still delivers solid call clarity. Switching to speakerphone, the volume reached 85dB, which is sufficiently loud if you need calls to cut through a noisy environment. Our threshold is 70dB, and the Razr+ cleared that bar with some room to spare.
It’s no surprise that the Razr+’s Dolby Atmos-tuned stereo speakers are easy on the ears. Our test track, The Knife's “Silent Shout,” sounded clean, clear, and crisp without any noticeable distortion at max volume. I still recommend pairing the foldable with the Bluetooth headphones of your choice.
Cameras: Ultrawide Is Back, But Telephoto Is Out
The previous Razr+ didn't have an ultrawide camera, so you couldn't capture landscape shots or wide group pictures to get more scenery into the frame. Motorola changed that on the 2026 model, dropping the telephoto for a 50MP ultrawide camera at f/2.0, so there's no more optical zoom to pull distant subjects closer. The Razr+ also has a 50MP, f/1.8 main camera as well as a 32MP, f/2.4 selfie shooter.
(Credit: Kimberly Gedeon)All three cameras use quad-pixel binning by default, so if you want to shoot at the cameras' full resolutions, you'll need to switch to high mode in settings. I took the Razr+'s shooters for a spin during a trip to Long Beach, California, so let's dive into their performance.
Main Camera
I'm a huge taco fanatic, and while this particular one I ate wasn't great, I thought the wide camera did a decent job of capturing my messy lunch.
I shot the dish in both standard and high-resolution modes. With the former, the orange tint of the taco shells looks deeper and more appetizing. High-res mode, on the other hand, excels at creating separation between the subject and the background; the blurred backdrop makes the taco shells appear much sharper and more striking by comparison.
You can see the same story with my shots of the Lincoln Park Giant Penny sculpture. Standard mode produces a slightly richer, warmer capture than high mode; it also appears more three-dimensional.
In this stingray photo, the sand and gravel appear more distinct and defined in the high-resolution shot—even the blue spots look a tinge punchier.
The standard mode shot holds up well; the differences become apparent when you zoom in and scrutinize the details.
Ultrawide Camera
Bringing back the ultrawide camera was the right call. Without a telephoto lens, you can still rely on digital zoom, but your zoomed-in shots will suffer in clarity. However, being left without an ultra-wide sensor is a huge limitation; there are no software tricks to artificially expand your field of view.
At night, I shot a nearby dock while queuing to enter Long Beach's Aquarium of the Pacific. I don't love this photo of the sky; there's too much noise. The palm trees look grainy, too. On the plus side, the exposure is balanced, the colors are natural, and it offers a sweeping perspective of the marina.
This early afternoon shot of the Cinemark theater has decent dynamic range; the white building preserves its detail, and the cloud isn't blown out.
Colors pop without that cartoonish, ultra-vivid look that marks some Android phones. Plus, there's no wild warping or inward bending, which occurs on some ultrawide sensors.
Zoom
As mentioned, there isn't a dedicated telephoto lens on the Razr+—and it shows.
I took a picture of my short rib dish at a restaurant. The 2x shot struggled to capture textures, from the distinct vertical lines on my potato to the delicate fibers on the beef. On the plus side, the image processing did well in spotting the cilantro flakes and string beans, creating sharp contrast lines between the green accents and the rest of the meal.
At 3x, the Razr+'s image processing tried to save the shot by overexposing the dish, but unfortunately, my dinner just looks like an inedible oil painting with a glossy sheen.
Selfie Camera
One drawback of using a traditional, nonfoldable phone is that it's awkward to take a selfie with the main camera. It's possible, but you don't have a viewfinder to see if you're in frame.
The Razr+ fixes that issue, allowing you to use its main camera for selfies while displaying a viewfinder on the outer screen. I took selfies with both the 32MP front-facing camera and the 50MP main camera.
The higher-quality main sensor produced more definition in my curls. Plus, my eyelashes, skin texture, and eyeliner look far crisper and sharper. My colorful jersey is more vibrant and accurate. The selfie taken with the 32MP camera had a more washed-out, hazy aesthetic, making the photo look flat in color and contrast.
Video
You can capture video with the Razr+ at up to 4K resolution at 60fps, or drop down to 1080p at 60fps or 30fps. It produces decent color and detail in bright conditions, but noise becomes noticeable in low light.
Software: Moto AI Troubles
The Razr+ ships with Android 16, and comes with three years of Android OS upgrades and five years of bi-monthly security updates. This is a step up from last year's three years of OS upgrades and four years of security support, but it looks stingy next to Galaxy Z Flip 7's seven-year commitment.
(Credit: Kimberly Gedeon)Moto AI is supposed to be the marquee software feature on the Razr+. Unfortunately, it refused to run on my review unit. While the software worked flawlessly on the standard Razr, Razr Ultra, and Edge, the Razr+ simply wouldn't run it. I tried every troubleshooting trick in the book, including a full factory reset, but nothing worked.
It’s possible I received a lemon, so I'm waiting on a replacement to see if this is an isolated incident or a broader bug. We'll update this review when we retest the new unit.
Moto AI troubles aside, the Razr+ still has some notable software features, including fun gestures to launch apps and tools. For example, I turned the flashlight on with two chopping motions and enabled Do Not Disturb by simply flipping the phone over.
As someone who loves to multitask, I also enjoy using the Razr+'s large screen to run two apps at once. I can put YouTube in the top half of the screen while taking notes on the bottom half. Between the productivity-friendly foldable form factor and Motorola’s thoughtful gestures, there’s still plenty to like here despite the non-working AI features.